Hi
I recently took the GMAT again. I got a 710 last time around but with a low quant score (68% percentile). Unfortunately, it did not go as I had expected this time around. 690 total score and 76% on quant and 87% on verbal is dissapointing but at least better on the quant part. Based on test exams on Manhattan Gmat I had expected more on both parts of the exam, I feel as if 690 is minimum attainable performance (I got a 99% percentile on quant on one test exam, cannot understand how managed the shit 76% percentile score). Still, I do not have time to retake it so have to choose between which GMAT score to report.
It is worth noting that the only two schools I will apply to is Columbia and London Business School (Masters in Finance). My intent is to take a finance focused MBA/MiF and then get a job in a long-only stock fund or a hedge fund. My goal is to get into buy-side equity.
Which one of the GMAT scores should I report?
It is possible for me to counteract the weak quant score I think; my employer sees quant analytical abilities as a strength of mine, I already have a Masters of Science in Finance with a quant focus (among 15% top students), and I am underway with the CFA.
It annoys the shit out of me that I could not manage at least 720 and 90% on verbal and 80% on quant, but guess I have to just let it go and focus on essays now. This standardised GMAT test...; will annoy me forever that were not able to get a top score.
Look forward to receving feedback:-)
Thanks in advance!
Kind regards Aleksander Karlsen