jschwabby83 Wrote:3) the only possibility left is that taken together, the two statements can tell us if she ever dropped below $1000 at any point during the month. Without a timestamp for a specific withdrawal of greater than $501 (1500-501 = 999, and hence would incur the penalty) we can't solve the problem.
ANSWER is E.
you have the right answer choice, but the wrong reasoning. it's irrelevant whether there is a "timestamp", because we know that the withdrawals were made at some point in the last month. (read the problem statement again: the fee only depends on
whether the balance goes below $1000
at any time during the month. the specific timing is immaterial.)
the reason why the two statements together are still insufficient is that
we have no information about deposits.
furthermore, we know that there definitely
are deposits, since the customer's withdrawals for the month are greater than her initial balance at the start of the month. so, in other words, there is no such objection as "oh, i didn't know there were deposits in the problem".