amar.doshi Wrote:This problem was pretty challenging... I think I found a way to solve it, but probably not something I would have been able to solve in 2 mins had I seen it for the first time! Here's how I approached it:
1 * 11 = 11
2 * 11 = 22
...
10*11 = 110
...
100*11 = 1100
101*11 = 1111
102*11 = 1122
...
401*11 = 4411
...
Hence (x0y)*11 = xxyy
for xxyy to be a perfect square, x0y itself must be equal to (11 * a perfect square)
is (11*2-square)*11 = xxyy?... 121*4 = 484, not four digits
is (11*5-square)*11 = xxyy?... 121*25 = 3025, four digits but no xxyy format
is (11*6-square)*11 = xxyy?... 121*36 = 4356, four digits but no xxyy format
is (11*7-square)*11 = xxyy?... 121*49 = 5929, four digits but no xxyy format
is (11*8-square)*11 = xxyy?... 121*64 = 7744, valid!
is (11*9-square)*11 = xxyy?... 121*81 = 9801, four digits but no xxyy format
is (11*10-square)*11 = xxyy?... 121*100 = 12100, five digits, so stop
Hence just 1 possibility
Is there a short cut based on standard math rules we are taught by MGMAT?
nice. notice that you basically duplicated ben ku's method, from above, with one exception: you discovered that XXYY = 11(X0Y) by random trial/error/pattern recognition, while ben found it by factoring. otherwise, your solutions seem to be exactly the same.
--
i can't really see a simpler way to solve this problem. per the original post, it was also taken from an exam that has nothing to do with the gmat - and you can certainly rest assured that you're not going to see something this obnoxious on the gmat - so you really don't have to worry about it.