RonPurewal Wrote:chetan86 Wrote:Hi Ron,
I am trying to understand how these concepts will be applicable.
In the question, if we had h(40)+1 rather than h(100)+1, then calculation would have been as follows?
h(40)+1 = 2^40*40!+1
As 2^40*40! and 2^40*40!+1 are consecutive number, they are co-prime and will no share any prime factor.
So the smallest prime factor for h(40)+1 would be greater than 40.
Am I correct?
Thanks!!!
not quite right.
don't skip steps!
write stuff out!
using the definition given here, h(40) is
2 • 4 • 6 • ... • 38 • 40
which is
(2•1) • (2•2) • (2•3) • ... • (2•19) • (2•20)
so, as you can see, this is actually 20! • 2^20. your 40's should actually be 20's.
(incidentally, that last sentence is also pretty good advice for how to live once you turn 40.)
RonPurewal Wrote:a surprisingly large proportion of your success on this exam will boil down to things like "write stuff down! answer the right question, and don't answer the wrong question!"
in other words, your first-grade teacher would absolutely adore this exam.
chetan86 Wrote:Thanks a lot for awesome suggestion :)
RonPurewal Wrote:chetan86 Wrote:Thanks a lot for awesome suggestion :)
sure.
by the way, you're looking at one of the reasons why many people don't improve on this exam: they desperately want the quant section to be "a math test".
problem is ... it isn't, really (except for people scoring toward the lower end of the quant scale).
in reality, it's a test of all the stuff surrounding the math-- stuff like organization, due diligence, careful reading, understanding goals, and so on.
a lot of people just don't want to study those things; they just cling to studying math, in the same way a baby might cling to a blanket.
... but those are the things that you should study.
RonPurewal Wrote:you're welcome and good luck.