Main reason behind my SC is that i wasn't as systematic with the SC approach
Good, so now you're learning that.
Unknowingly, I try to understand the passage as if i can answer Q from my memory without looking back at passage.
In other contexts (like school), that might be a good strategy - it just isn't here because we have so little time.
Also, think of it this way: you're actually wasting your valuable time when you try to understand and remember EVERYthing because you absolutely know that you are NOT going to get asked about everything in the passage. Would you waste valuable and precious time like that when you're post-MBA running your own company? No way! So don't do it here either. :)
In CR i note only P --> C relationship (Suggested in Manhattan LSAT CR) and in case of non-Assumption Q i do take some note to understand whats going on specially in Inference. I did some CR from OG11, and decided not to take notes for easy and my strengths Q type and take notes for tough to comprehend argument. What do you say?
Totally fine as long as you're happy with your performance level. There are so many variations in how things can be done - the only rule really is "if you want to get better, something has to change; if you're happy as things are, then don't change anything."
My current Verbal timing on an average are close to:
100+ seconds for SC
120-150 seconds for CR
6-7 minutes for Short Passages with 3Q
8-10 minutes for Long Passages with 4Q
The above would cause you to run out of time before a test section is over.
He recommends:
45 sec for SC
90 seconds for CR
use remaining ~40 minutes for RC.
Wow, I don't know many people who could do that. I wouldn't feel comfortable recommending that as a general strategy to most people.
As a general rule, you do not want to allocate more time to your weakest area. You want to make sure to spend adequate time on your strengths in order to get right the things that you know how to get right. If you have to cut time on anything, you cut on your weaknesses.
Remember that you are NOT trying to get everything right. You may have already read this but, if so, read it again:
http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index ... to-win-it/Also, there are more SCs than any other type, so don't sacrifice SC unless necessary!
Your 2nd post:
With abbreviated notes my accuracy is close to 100%. (How ironic is that i resisted taking notes until recently :-( )
But i am taking around ~ 2 minutes (plus minus 15 seconds) to solve a CR Q but with confidence and 100% accuracy.
Good and good.
Re: your last question, I personally prefer the official questions for verbal. For quant, I like a combination of the official questions and some high-quality test-prep questions (because I do sometimes feel that there could be more really hard quant Qs).