mostly because doing well on the first half generally in most cases would position you well to get a good/great score. So I am cautious about this and avoid guessing, especially in the first 10 questions. Now post the first 10-12 questions I think I should make a decision soon if I need move ahead and guess on a particular question
It's a myth that the earlier questions are worth more than the later ones.
Do not wait to start implementing this mindset. Do it right from the first question!
Re: your second paragraph, recast it this way. Let's say that you're an investor in the tech field. You know all about every tech field out there—you've got lots of experience.
Does that mean that, when someone approaches you with some kind of tech investment, you give it a shot? After all, you know about everything in this space.
Of coures not—you don't invest just because the opportunity is presented to you. That would be absurd. You invest only when you have weighed the various factors and decided that the potential ROI is worth the risk.
The problem right now is that you're judging everything (or almost everything) worth the risk because you are weighting the
chance of getting something right
much higher than you are weighting the resources (time, mental energy) that it would take, and you are not actually taking into account the risk that you would get this one wrong even if you spent 10 minutes on it. If this were a real-world investment, you would never make your decisions that way.
So I think I need to probably guess and move ahead if my first approach itself took me more than 2 minutes. Will there be a scenario wherein I can use the alternate approach without compromising much on the target time.Again, think of this from an investment scenario. You're investing in a company. They tell you, "We could use strategy A or strategy B, but we think strategy A is better, so that's what we're going to use." Great.
They use it. It fails.
Now they come back to you asking for more money to try strategy B. Would you pay more to try the second-best strategy, especially knowing that the first-best already failed?
If you choose a strategy but realize 30 seconds in that the other strategy is better, then it's fine to switch to the other. But don't try an entire strategy and only then try another.
Just try the one that you think is best—one shot. That's it.
Note: If you realize after trying the entire strategy that you should have used the other one in the first place...still don't try it NOW. For all you know, the only reason that other one seems better is that you now know the first one didn't work—those aren't great odds. Guess, move on, and internalize the lesson that, next time, you want to make a different choice. Oh, and then (
later) try that question again with the other strategy to make sure it really does work.
Okay, big picture. Your Q is already in the high 40s. Mastering the mindset should hopefully help you get up to 49-50 consistently, but yes, the V side is where you need more work.
If you can get Q to 49-50, then you would need to hit V 35-36 to get to 700. (And higher will get you further, obviously.) I can't tell you what time frame or what # or type of question will be enough, unfortunately—there are too many individual variables involved.
But I think I can say, based on the data you've provided, that if you can fix this mindset and not run out of time in the fourth quadrant, that should help you to get
at least halfway from your current V score (27) to your goal (35+). And maybe further, since your practice tests have been a lot higher.
Your percentiles were similar for the three question types, so you'd want to work fairly equally on all three—though if you think one area is easier for you to learn for whatever reason, then you can concentrate some extra time / attention there. I would start by going back to your most recent practice tests and diving into the questions to analyze where things went wrong. I would look not just at the ones you got wrong, but also the ones that you got right.
On the ones you got right, make sure that you didn't get lucky at all—you 100% knew what you were doing. See whether you can articulate, out loud, how to think your way through the problem, including why the wrong answers are wrong and why the right one is right. Pretend you're explaining it to someone else. If you can do that without getting turned around (you'll hear it if you don't really know what you're saying), then you know you were good on that problem.
If, on the other hand, you're not really sure how to explain, then you know that you have something to learn. Go learn whatever that thing is. If it's a grammar rule, return to your grammar book(s). If it's a process or strategy for CR / RC, return to those study materials. If it's more a logical thing (maybe you don't really understand how a particular answer fits into the argument), check the official solution (or our solution on Navigator, if it's OG). If that doesn't help enough, try googling it to see other explanations.
If you get something wrong, then you'll need to decide whether this is something that you can learn to get right or whether you did legitimately get it wrong and you'd probably get it wrong again next time, too. If the latter is the case, then how could you have recognized the low ROI opportunity sooner so that you could have guessed faster?
If the former, then you're looking to understand:
1) Why was the wrong answer so tempting?Wwhy did it look like it might be right? (be as explicit as possible; also, now you know this is not a good reason to pick an answer)
2) Why was it actually wrong? What specific words indicate that it is wrong and how did I overlook those clues the first time? (Look up anything you like in your books re: rules, strategy, etc.)
3) Why did the right answer seem wrong? What made it so tempting to cross off the right answer? Why were those things actually okay; what was my error in thinking that they were wrong? (also, now you know that this is not a good reason to eliminate an answer)
4) Why was it actually right?
You will want to work with some new material, but I also think it's good to go back to your older OG material. Something didn't fully stick the first time around with at least some of that material—so there's some deeper analysis to be done there. I would start with older material and really dig in / get used to the analysis process I described above. As you feel more comfortable with that you can use new questions to test yourself.
If you are at the point of having to see repeated questions on the CATs that you currently have, then yes, you should consider buying the additional official practice CATs.
Finally, in terms of timeframe, I know I said I couldn't tell you exactly how long "should" be enough time—and I still can't—but I will say that if you can fix your mindset issue, then you will be most of the way there. That issue can be a really hard one to fix, though—some people take a really long time and some people are never able to fully make the switch. Just be very hard on yourself about getting into the investment mindframe: If this were happening in the (equivalent) investment world, what would I decide right now? And when the logical decision is NOT to invest, follow it.