ashwinkumar96 Wrote:What about the difference between in which and where.
Which is used when the place is metaphorical but here I guess the "sites" are not metaphorical so why use which?
well, if something happens
in a physical place, then it's perfectly legitimate to use "in which" -- in these cases, you could use either "where" or "in which".
if you are talking about something that is clearly not a place, either physically or as a reasonably direct metaphor, then you can't use "where". for instance,
a rant in which Smith denounced all of his bosses at work --> this works
a rant where Smith denounced all of his bosses at work --> this doesn't work.
the reverse situation also exists: if you are talking about a situation that happens at a particular place -- that doesn't happen
in that place -- then you can use "where" but not "in which".
the table in which i left my books --> wrong; you don't leave books inside a table. (NOTE if your native language is spanish: you can't translate
en la mesa directly.)
the table where i left my books --> correct.
(you could also say "on which" here.)
--
do note that GMAC has occasionally published correct sentences in which "where" has represented things that aren't necessarily physical locations, but are reasonably direct metaphor for physical locations.
in particular, i remember that this has happened with the word "societies"; here's a reference:
post35020.html