by StaceyKoprince Wed Apr 09, 2014 4:55 pm
I'm going to respond to your first post first.
From your list of 8 things (if I don't comment, that's because I like what you wrote!):
3. I spend a minimum of probably 4 to 5 minutes reviewing any problem, even if I got it right and thought it was pretty easy. There are often still shortcuts to find, traps to discover / understand, etc. And if I actually had a problem, I might spend 10 to 20 minutes or more! Part of that time includes going back into a book, for example, or even doing some drills on something that gave me trouble.
6. A student recently told me that she guessed - outright guessed and moved on almost immediately - on 4 quant questions. She scored a 51. (This was all on the real test!)
Second post:
I can't, unfortunately, do the data analysis for you - it takes 30 to 45 minutes even for me. If you'd like me to have the data, you'll need to draw up the 5 buckets and tell me.
A few things do pop out at me from the screen shot you posted. You lost, on average, 47 seconds per incorrect DS, or more than 5 minutes total. Meanwhile, your incorrect PS averaged 30 seconds faster than normal.
On which questions should you have cut yourself off faster? On which questions would an extra 30 seconds have made a difference?
How many of your incorrect answers were careless errors?
Dig into RC and figure out what happened there. I can't quite tell from the averages, but it looks like you were going pretty fast.
Geo time is too high. Look for things you got right or wrong too slowly AND things you got wrong too quickly.
It's good to get something wrong fast when you know you don't know what to do. But how many of those were problems you could've done?
Stacey Koprince
Instructor
Director, Content & Curriculum
ManhattanPrep