If you're experiencing a roadblock with one of the Manhattan Prep GMAT math strategy guides, help is here!
MarthaM266
Course Students
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:03 am
 

Advanced Quant: Pattern Recognition

by MarthaM266 Sun Sep 06, 2015 4:58 pm

In the Advanced Quant book - Page 151 - Problem 4:

What is the units digit of y?
1) The units digit of y squared equals 6
2) The units digit of (y+1)squared equals 5

The answer is B. I picked E - and can't figure how B is sufficient.

1 - leaves you with 4,6, -4, -6
2 - leaves you with -6, 4

How can they concur this is sufficient?

Thanks!
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: Advanced Quant: Pattern Recognition

by tim Mon Sep 07, 2015 1:09 am

In my book, this problem shows up on page 161, not page 151, and the problem stipulates that y is a positive integer. If your book shows this problem on page 151 OR fails to indicate that y is a positive integer, can you post a picture of the page so I can investigate the discrepancy?
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Advanced Quant: Pattern Recognition

by RonPurewal Tue Sep 08, 2015 12:05 pm

also, on this exam you will NEVER have to consider negative numbers for a problem about digits.
...or factors, or remainders, or primes, or basically anything else that's traditionally learned in a context of purely positive integers.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Advanced Quant: Pattern Recognition

by RonPurewal Tue Sep 08, 2015 12:05 pm

RonPurewal Wrote:also, on this exam you will NEVER have to consider negative numbers for a problem about digits.
...or factors, or remainders, or primes, or basically anything else that's traditionally learned in a context of purely positive integers.


the above ^^ is really just one case of what i stated more generally here:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... ml#p116154