Verbal problems from the *free* official practice tests and
problems from mba.com
vietst
 
 

A study on couples' retirement transitions found that

by vietst Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:52 am

A study on couples' retirement transitions found that women who took new jobs after retiring from their primary careers reported high marital satisfaction, more so than those who retired completely.
A. more so than those who retired
B. which was more than if they had retired
C. more than when retiring
D. more than if they were to retire
E. which was more so than those retiring
OA is A.
I wonder whether "more so than" is also an idiom?
Thanks
StaceyKoprince
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 9363
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:05 am
Location: Montreal
 

by StaceyKoprince Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:22 pm

Yes, it is. It is used in making a "more than" type of comparison where you also want to refer to a previously stated verb / action (that's where the "so" comes in). In this case, the "so" refers to "reported high marital satisfaction."

Notice here that you are comparing two groups of women: those who take new jobs, and those who retire completely. When making a comparison, you have to make sure you explicitly mention both groups.

B, C, and D don't do this. (In fact, B and D change the original meaning of the sentence to make the second part of the comparison a hypothetical - but the original meaning is that the ones who take new jobs are being compared to those who don't.)

Also remember that, for comparisons, they two things / groups / whatever compared should be parallel. "women who took" and "those who retired" are parallel. The other options aren't.
Stacey Koprince
Instructor
Director, Content & Curriculum
ManhattanPrep
H
 
 

by H Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:37 pm

Can I say "more than did those who retired completely"? Does it retain the same meaning?
Thanks in advance.
H
 
 

by H Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:46 pm

Hi Stacey, I agree that when two different groups are compared, both groups have to be explicitly stated.
However, OG's explanation for OG10-187 says "those who is a wordy intrusion".
In order to avoid the copyright issue, I modify the sentence slightly.
In War X in 1800, four times as many Americans were killed as those who would later be killed during D-Day.
The explanation says that "those who" is a wordy intrusion; and the correct answer basically omits "those who".
Am I missing something? Or is it just another inconsistent explanation from GMAC?
StaceyKoprince
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 9363
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:05 am
Location: Montreal
 

by StaceyKoprince Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:05 am

You can say "more than did those" as long as you are properly referring to a verb with "did" and referring properly to a noun with "those."

But that's a little clunkier than the given option.

What needs to be repeated is what's strictly being compared. So, in this case, what is the strict comparison? Something numerical about two different wars / time frames. "four times as many were killed as would be killed. The word "Americans" is part of the comparison, answering the question what / who was "as many as" ("as many Americans as"). Know for future that there's often some word that's "part of" the comparison language and that word doesn't need to be repeated - it applies to both parts of the comparison already.
Stacey Koprince
Instructor
Director, Content & Curriculum
ManhattanPrep
H
 
 

by H Wed Jul 23, 2008 12:47 am

Thanks Stacey.

I have one more question about "more so than...".

You said that "more than did those who..." is clunkier than "more so than those who...".

Does it mean if two choices are exactly same except that one uses "more than did" and another uses "more so than", then "more so than" is always preferred?

Thanks in advance.
H
 
 

by H Sun Jul 27, 2008 7:39 pm

Hi Stacey,

"more so" is so puzzled to me.
Could you explain a little bit more about its usage?
I found an OG question using "more so" but the "so" doesn't refer to a verb as the prep question does.
Here is the sentence (without posting the full question ;-)
The use of chemical pesticides in this country is as extensive as it was ten years ago, if not more so.
"more so" in this sentence seems to replace "extensive than it was ten years ago".
Is there any rule that defines what "more so" can replace?
Thanks in advance.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

by RonPurewal Fri Aug 08, 2008 6:00 am

H Wrote:Hi Stacey,

"more so" is so puzzled to me.
Could you explain a little bit more about its usage?
I found an OG question using "more so" but the "so" doesn't refer to a verb as the prep question does.
Here is the sentence (without posting the full question ;-)
The use of chemical pesticides in this country is as extensive as it was ten years ago, if not more so.
"more so" in this sentence seems to replace "extensive than it was ten years ago".
Is there any rule that defines what "more so" can replace?
Thanks in advance.


the rule i like to use here is this: if it's not a specific NOUN that can be replaced by a PRONOUN (usually "it"), then use the all-purpose replacement "...so".
perhaps the most common usage in which you'll see this is "do it" vs. "do so":
wrong: i've always wanted to jump out of a plane, but i've never had the chance to do it. --> this is wrong because the only possible antecedent for "it" is plane, and it doesn't make any sense to talk about "doing" a plane.
correct: i've always wanted to jump out of a plane, but i've never had the chance to do so. --> "do so" = jump out of a plane.

you would extend this same type of extra freedom to "more so": if the comparison isn't quite parallel, and/or is ambiguous, without the "so", then go ahead and toss it in there; it doesn't have to have a single-word antecedent.
deadpig1987hahaha
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 4:30 am
 

Re: A study on couples' retirement transitions found that

by deadpig1987hahaha Thu Aug 13, 2009 12:57 pm

thanks for the great explanation!

But if I want to compare with a hypothetical, would it be right if I say:
A study on couples' retirement transitions found that women who took new jobs after retiring from their primary careers reported high marital satisfaction, more so than if they were retired completely.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: A study on couples' retirement transitions found that

by RonPurewal Thu Aug 27, 2009 4:13 am

deadpig1987hahaha Wrote:thanks for the great explanation!

But if I want to compare with a hypothetical, would it be right if I say:
A study on couples' retirement transitions found that women who took new jobs after retiring from their primary careers reported high marital satisfaction, more so than if they were retired completely.


you'd use "were they to retire", not "were they retired". otherwise, yes, correct.

("were they retired" implies that they were already retired at the time of the hypothetical. "were they to retire" indicates that this is one of their options at that time.
get this as a takeaway if you like.)
xingym
Students
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 2:56 am
 

Re: A study on couples' retirement transitions found that

by xingym Mon Nov 07, 2011 9:35 am

the choice A - "more so than those who retired"

is it an adj phrase to modify the whole that clause following "found"? not very clear what role it plays in this context
namnam123
Students
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
 

Re: A study on couples' retirement transitions found that

by namnam123 Tue Nov 08, 2011 1:19 am

vietst Wrote:A study on couples' retirement transitions found that women who took new jobs after retiring from their primary careers reported high marital satisfaction, more so than those who retired completely.
A. more so than those who retired
B. which was more than if they had retired
C. more than when retiring
D. more than if they were to retire
E. which was more so than those retiring
OA is A.
I wonder whether "more so than" is also an idiom?
Thanks


I do not understand meaning of A.

A means:
person who took new job reported high satisfaction more than those who retired completely reported high satisfaction

or
person who took new job reported high satisfaction which is more than satisfaction that woman who retired completely reported.

which meaning is correct?
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: A study on couples' retirement transitions found that

by RonPurewal Wed Nov 23, 2011 7:55 am

namnam123 Wrote:I do not understand meaning of A.

A means:
person who took new job reported high satisfaction more than those who retired completely reported high satisfaction

or
person who took new job reported high satisfaction which is more than satisfaction that woman who retired completely reported.

which meaning is correct?


these look the same to me -- i'm not seeing the difference. they both seem accurate.
ntr1989512
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 10:25 pm
 

Re: A study on couples' retirement transitions found that

by ntr1989512 Wed Apr 18, 2012 3:24 am

hi,ron
is the phrase "more so than those who retired completely. " a absolute phrase ??
please help, thanks in advance
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: A study on couples' retirement transitions found that

by RonPurewal Mon May 07, 2012 3:06 am

ntr1989512 Wrote:hi,ron
is the phrase "more so than those who retired completely. " a absolute phrase ??
please help, thanks in advance


i actually don't know what it's called. i don't think it's an absolute phrase.
(fun fact: i really don't know any of these grammar terms, other than super basic stuff like subject/verb/noun/adjective/etc. if you see me using a more fancy term, the odds that i just looked it up on google before posting are very close to 100%.)

the only thing that's important, though, is that you remember how these things are structured and used.
if you call something an "absolute phrase" and i call it "joe", then we are both fine, as long as both of us are using the construction correctly.