erpriyankabishnoi Wrote:Sorry, I still don't understand this point.
you only do what you're doing if you are making both selections
from the same group. in this problem, we are selecting from two different pools, so that's not the correct approach.
for instance: (a normal american deck of cards contains 52 cards, of which 13 are hearts and 13 are spades.)
* if you draw two cards from the SAME DECK, the chance of picking one heart and one spade is
(Spade then Heart) + (Heart then Spade)
= (13/52)(13/51) + (13/52)(13/51)
* if you draw one card from DECK 1 and another card from DECK 2, then the probability that you get a heart from DECK 1 and a spade from DECK 2 is just (13/52)(13/52).
tim's point is that, in cases such as this one, you have to just pick one order of selection and stick with it. i.e., you just pick DECK 1 then DECK 2; you don't also pick in the reverse order.
--
you can also test your logic using cases for which the answers are already obvious with common sense.
for instance, consider 2 decks that contain 10 cards, ALL of which are black.
... what's the probability of picking a black card from each deck?
(obviously, the answer to this question is 1, since you have nothing but black cards.)
using your logic, you would get that the answer to this question is (1)(1) + (1)(1) = 2, which is not a valid probability.
instead, the answer is just (1)(1).