by liangl431 Sat Jan 07, 2017 7:56 pm
HI Ron,
i can dimiss CED according the paralism rule. but A and B is pretty confusing:
A, excepet what you have put before: the meaning of "developed as a way for" is pretty much nonsence. which i have not notice in the first place.
i think this option is even more paralism that B, because it clearly states: that it comprises= is . not the holds in the main clause.
in B, we have a "but instead comprises", may be this "comprises " can be misunderstand to paralize with the main clause "holds"
this is how i take B. i just feel a bit confused. may be i should go to the choice without thinking about the paralism. just pick one with "develed to ", which sounds more comfort to me...