I definitively agree with the good points made about C and E above. Here is my two cents: there may be an additional reason to choose E (E does not resolve the paradox). E compares the fact that more kinds of lamps were produced by the M culture than "earlier cultures" without specifying w...

Saying it could be the baking soda that is mislabled and referred to by the conclusion is not right I think. The stimulus said "this bottle" is labeled as vinegar and the conclusion refers to "this bottle" clearly has been mislabeled, while the for baking soda, the stimulus said ...

The dictionary definition of "eliminate" is: "completely remove or get rid of (something)."

HeL780's explanation is spot on! Thanks!

The conclusion is NOT a valid contrapositive, as confirmed by Kaplan book and a different forum.

Sung MinP119 Wrote:I dont get how
~SETTLE UNEVENLY AND CRACK -> POURED GROUND WET
equals to
~SETTLE UNEVENLY->~POURED GROUND WET OR CRACK.
Isnt this incorrect as it violates the rule of 'contrapositive'??

The candidiate/politician said two things in the stimulus: 1) if elected will reduce government spending, 2) provide government assistance to solve most pressing needs. Why we directly jump to the 2nd statement as the promise of them answer A refers to but not the 1st statement? The answer would be ...