I can see why you might not eliminate (E) right away. It does slightly undermine the dietician's argument by suggesting that red wine is certainly not necessary to lowering heart disease. But let's be clear - that's not the dietician's argument! Far from it, the dietician is merely saying this is a...

Hey, there. The reason (D) is out of scope is that the conclusion is only trying to prove that drinking more red wine would make you healthier . The conclusion is NOT claiming that drinking red wine is the healthiest route to better health. So you can't weaken the claim that red wine makes you heal...

Actually you guys explanation make this question more difficult than it is actually. Premise: absent 10 do not drop the productivity. Conclusion: fire 10 do not drop the productivity. The author assume absent 10 equal to fire 10. It must assume when fire 10, perhaps there is no one absent. It at lea...

I find a better way to deal with such a parallel question. Thoughts from left and right half brain result sleepless. Sheep accounting remove the cause of sleepless, sheep accounting result a situation remove the sleepless effect. Only B is parallel, cat claws and teeth result damage of furniture. To...

I don't get it how is C weak and wrong? Isn't C also has the possibility of stay the same? How is "not become more harmonious" equals "become more discordant"? What about stay the same? Just like the stimulus's pattern of flaw? Also, where is the weak? The stimulus also said &qu...

Tough question, and some really interesting thoughts being raised in this thread in response to it! I think one thing that makes this question so tough is that the conclusion is actually a somewhat complex idea - sorting out what the conclusion is actually saying is critical for our understanding o...

Yes, jumping from "improving well-being" to "benefit" is acceptable. I know a lot of people struggle with this question. The conclusion of it is that the government should ensure that day care is available to everyone (by financing it - and high-quality day care at that!). Why? ...

I just want to add something here. There are only 4 or 5 questions in the history of the LSAT that I believe I can disprove the credited answer choice. This is one of them. Evidence: 1. Propaganda and eduction are never the same thing. 2. Propaganda is nothing but an attempt to influence behavior t...

One of the most powerful strategies for both types of Assumption questions (and Principle-Support) is always asking yourself, "Is there a NEW GUY in the Conclusion?" When LSAT is testing "missing logic links" , as opposed to "out of the box, overlooked considerations",...

Because I do it wrong the first time for choosing E, I would like to explain why E is wrong. p plankton can’t survive in the seawater that does not include enough neurotoxin domoic acid along with other compounds. It is said the domoic acid along with other compounds is necessary. Without domoic aci...

B is right and C is wrong, why? The scope of this passage is the legal reasoning system, it is not the computer system. B said the vulnerability of rule in legal reasoning system, it is actually in the passage scope. C said isolate the issue the computer system can’t handle, it enlarger the scope of...