This is a necessary assumption question. I selected (B) but don't undertand why (A) is correct. Is (B) wrong because it's too general (i.e. it doesn;t talk about the cafeteria's apples)?

This type of principle question throws me off. Given this type of question, I think that we can only conclude the necessary condition and the negation of the sufficient condition. So, in this specific question, we can conclude that that a gift is intended to benefit the recepient and is worth more.....

I believe that this is a strengthen question. The sufficient and necessary terms in the answer choices threw me off a bit. I think that "only if" introduces a necessary condition, but I'm not sure why (C) is correct.

I wasn't sure why (B) solved the discrepancy. Is it because it only talks about when?

What would be the best way to solve a lengthy question like this one? I wasn't sure why (B) was correct.

I didn't notice the assumption flaw in the stimulus, so I was surprised that (B) was the correct answer. Any advice? Thanks.

I didn't see the sufficient/necessary flaw in the stimulus, so I was surprised that (D) was the correct answer. Could you please explain this? Thanks.

I know that this is a parallel reasoning question, but I can't seem to figure out by (D) is right. Any help would be great. Thanks.

I know that this is a parallel reasoning question, but I can't seem to figure out by (B) is right. Is it necessary to parallel the "except" in the stimulus with the "unless" in the correct answer choice? That might have thrown me off. Any help would be great. Thanks.

I was wondering if you'd diagram this question? I was thinking (A) would be correct but the language is too strong. Not exactly sure why (E) is correct.

This is a necessary assumption question. Since the stimulus used concrete numbers, I was looking for an answer choice that did the same. I ultimately guessed with (D) but can't seem to figure out why it's correct.

This is a sufficient assumption question. I tried diagramming the stimulus in order to find the missing premise but had some difficulty.

This is a sufficient assumption question. The correct answer is (C), yet I did not ultimately choose this answer because of the word "any." I felt that this was too strong. Any explanation for this question would be appreciated!

Based on the question stem, this is a sufficient assumption question. I had trouble with the answer choices. All of them seemed so similar with the terminology and with the way that they were presented. How would you go about solving this problem? Thanks!

I realize that this is a sufficient assumption question. I just wasn't sure of the best way of attacking this question. Numbers and percentages seem to trip me up.

What would be the best way to attack this problem? Would you diagram it? I tried to, but the "nearly all" threw me off a bit.

How would you go about diagramming this one? "Their occurrence together..." seems to indicate a sufficient condition, but the previous sentence threw me off a bit.