(E) is wrong b/c its focus is off and what it claims is in part both blatantly incorrect (directly goes against the passage) and unsupported. OFF-FOCUS: (E) almost seems to defend advertising in saying that what M have done is not good enough to attack advertising. But the passage isn't a defense of...

First, sorry this slipped through the cracks. It's been a crazy couple of weeks. Second, I think you're totally right! I actually took this LSAT because I wanted a crack at the new digital platform and I found this one really challenging for that reason. I do not believe that the expert's argument ...

I have a contention with the explanation for (A)'s incorrectness. The STIM does say for Sarah that "Reporters ALWAYS interpret the news." ALWAYS applies to ALL situations with regards to how reporters handle the news, whether it be in writing news stories, presenting them, picking them, or...

I don't believe S is saying or assuming they are the same kind of activity. Rather, it is just T who is banking his conclusion on that interpretation that S's ARG good → [F = V]. T then proceeds to show us that [F ≠ V] and therefore that S's ARG is not good. I see S's claim in different terms: Old e...