Can any teacher correct me if im wrong?

HL --some---> ~PT = PT --some---> ~HL

Some A are not B, so some B are not A

My conclusion is: this question wants to test it.

Hi folks,

I have two questions: does the last sentence imply everyone the author has one of the two personalities? I also have trouble understanding what D means.

Would any teacher like to help?

Thanks in advance.

For the answer choice D, does the "either" "or" include the possibility that one person can have both personalities?

Thanks in advance

I think this question in abstract language: People create A to do B. A can't do B because one of characteristic of A prevents A from doing B. C can build up a bridge between A and B. So A is necessary. The necessary assumption is "people" do not include the characteristic of C. There is an...

I picked E, and now I think E is wrong because it has nothing to do with the argument. From the perspective of manhattan prep textbook, it is, if anything, a "premise debooster."

It would be interesting to think this question in these two ways 93 percent people who run a lot are becoming vulnerable to knee injury. Since Tom runs a lot, it is quite likely that he is vulnerable to knee injury. (E would be the correct answer) and, 93 percent people who run a lot are becoming vu...

I feel lissethbayona's elaboration on "appropriate" and "accessible" is helpful. "No access" = "not [any] accessible" Big takeaway: The tone of language could change so long as the degree does not change ("no access" to "not any accessible"...

What Samuel says is computers result in dissolution, not creation, of social bonds What Tova says is more often computers replace asocial and antisocial behavior A. None of two has opinion about "modern life" B. None of two has opinion about "private behavior" C. Samuel agrees, w...

Sure thing dude. Core: Premise1(the second sentence) : determinism is true --> "given point" does not fail Premise2 (the third sentence) : since we cannot know the whole picture, we can't know the "given point" Conclusion: determinism is false, by implying the contrapositive o...

Hi teachers, Both are more difficult conditional statements: 1. Donnie will get A if and only if he studies hard and he is smart. Diagram: A <--> study hard + smart Contrapositive: ~A <--> ~study hard OR ~smart 2. Donnie will get A unless he studies hard or he is smart Diagram: ~ study h...

Hi, I'm a little bit confused of Noah's explanation on D. Yes, D definitely points out the flaw that inexpensive books are necessary to the establishment of traditional school. It also makes sense for me that there would be many factors contributing to the establishment. My question is: it seems for...

Hi geeks, I completely agree the point that this passage is extremely strange and complicated. My understanding of the passage: paragraph1: much researches claim the "right to work" laws do not work because they did not reduce union membership. Carroll does not buy this take at all, and he...

""""""" [quote="mattsherman"]Watch the pattern on this one closely. It's so typical on the LSAT. If you learn to spot it you can pick 3 to 4 questions per test, easily. Evidence Those who are responsible for passing laws repeated the patterns of history. ...

All posts are helpful. But I wondered if Noah or Patrick would provide some thoughts?

Can anyone go over the core in this question? I am still unsure about the last sentence. What kind of role does it play? I know it is a premise, but I don't understand how it is connected with the first sentence and the conclusion?

Thank you.

I got a little bit confused about answer choice A. the CORE: Not demolishing the complex would have benefited everyone------> Government's action that demolished the complex is immoral. EVEN IF in answer choice doesn't make any sense for me---"fails to consider that an action may be morally ...

I got the answer correct. I ruled out all four incorrect answers by abstracting the core--because a part has the characteristics A, the whole has the same characteristics.

Do I solve this question correctly?

Thank you, Geeks.

It was quite clear for me that T and P have sufficient/ necessary assumption flaws, though it was very unlikely for me to point exactly what the flaws are under the time pressure. LSAT Geeks, my question is: if the feeling that there must be some sufficient/ necessary flaws involved in the argument ...

It took me 15 mins to understand this question: Core: the survey asked all city resident over 19 whether they were high school graduates and computed the proportion who were not ---> Center City was among the ten cities in the nation with highest dropout rate from its school. All residents -----&...

See the word "should" in the conclusion. That's a recommendation, and to prove it, we'll need some evidence about what people should be doing. But there isn't any! So the correct answer should involve that subjectivity. Hey Matt, I'm not sure if you can answer me. I have a question, in the...