Lol

I too was confused with the wording.

"One rather than the other of two"

My eyes are starting to glaze :p

Through my practice I am coming across many interesting passages. Unfortunately, the preptests only provide references to a small portion of the works. For further unrelated reading, where could I find comprehensive bibliographical information of these tests?

"For further unrelated reading"

I do hope that these passages are presenting real information, and not just make believe stuff.

D vs E please

I see in the last paragraph: "the front-to-back is motivated in part by the traditional desire in science to separate the observer from the phenomenon"

This passage was hell. I am seeing a declining trend in the difficulty levels of old vs recent LSATs. Is it only me that feels this way?

>.< lol

I've reserves October for RC, and currently I've completed all of the available Preptests (having purchased all of the official LSAC books). My scores now are generally 0-3 errors per passage between 34-45 min, having achieved just one short of 100% under 30 min at one point (which is still consider...

Thanks for the effort, I understand where I stumbled.

I ultimately chose C over E, but I am having trouble seeing the points of inference. Could someone give me a brief sketch please?

I agree with above. I chose C base on line 55 "process of the dialogue between Nisa and Shostak"

I too was confused between A and E, but I could see where E probably fails: the first one talks about labour uses, while the second talks about spiritual uses. So "those events" are different in each hypothesis.

I don't get the answer

I know what 'equivocate' means, as in to use unclear language to deceive

But what does 'equivocates with respect to a central argument' mean?