James's argument does not exclude two situations you mentioned, e.g. the public is unable to evaluate complex issue because the candidate doesn't make their statement clear. In stimulus, there are two possible explanation for Reade's popularity, i.e. his discussion of complex issue or simply trustwo...

The analogy given here may still be a "example", since policy freedom is still a subset of freedom in general. A analogy may be "....just as the beauty of garden is not simply measured by the quantities of plants but also by the variety of plants it includes. :) I agree with you that ...

Could "people who have habitually sleep less than six hours" be CERTAIN people "sleep less than six hours"?

A may wrong because of the relationship between two objects in comparison. Mexico city and Panama city are less related, compared to Henrietta and her daughter.

Line 27-29 proved a reason to study action of Asian settlers. Hence, significance of immigration probably is not a concern.

Irrelevant comparison. Works of literature and modern literature can both damage society and individual. Can someone explain why A is wrong? The only reason I can think of is that it is too strong to assume. The any makes it too strong. What else though? What are the other reasons to eliminate A. I ...

Yes, the author address "authoritarianism", "fail to address modern medical dilemma" "incompatible with narket-driven medical industry", as criticism for H oath, together with outdated moral rules. Hence, the "purpose" for periphery revision actually is unclea...

For B, what if it says "fail to distinguish a type of behavior from a type of stimulus that may or may not required by this behavior", is this correct?

To add, D is wrong because the argument it disputes draw conclusion from "tv alter buying habit" (as stated in line 3, "some people conclude from this"). The argument disputed does not offer another premise. So, there are no clue that the argument disputed intended to address ano...

Finding mass of neutrino adds to 'our understanding of the role elementary particles play in holding the universe together'. A parallel analogy need to be a child interested in board games find a book for chess. However, board games include chess, five-in-a-row and so forth. Answer D has the individ...

Ok so let's break this down: A) you are stating that you simply presume that something has order and coherence which leads the person to construct a dream narrative that is coherent. Sounds a little far fetched to me. People are walking around with presumptions that other people have coherent dream...

In stimulus, it says "M (distinct culture) has N (differs in moral code). thus, as long as M, there is K (no value shared across culture)." The conditional conclusion exclude (M, not K) combination, and the assumption must be "if N, not K". Answer choice A D E weakens by giving p...

I found answer A is questionable. Conclusion in stimulus is: there is no evidence to support that animal species' extinction rate is now accelerating. Any counter example to show "there is an evidence" is sufficient to reject the conclusion, no matter the example is "representative&qu...

I found the answer may be problematic. Passage A (lin2 two) says that caries are strongly linked to "sticky, carbohydrate-rich staples" and agricultural diet has "carbohydrate-rich staples". This link have been demonstrated (line 11) by showing non-agricultural diet (meat) result...

Didn't anyone have a trouble with wording of the question... like the word "primarily?" The "primarily" means 1. for the most part (as chiefly) 2. in the first place (as originally) in Merriam-Webster Dictionary App. I take the first meaning. As bbirdwell correctly pointed, &quo...

What if choice A says "the argument overlooks the possibility that light peppered moths has less predators than dark peppered months." Is this just "weaken" stimulus rather than "undermine" stimulus? Could we call a "weakening" to be a flaw?

To add it, answer B is "less strengthen" rather than "irrelevant". The stimulus compares "changes in productivity" between two groups. In perfect situation, those two groups need to start and end working at the same time, before and during this study. To test significan...

For McKinley, the assumption he made is "Placebo will have less (or more, but 'more' is unlikely in this case) various of effects on patients' bodies compare to drugs", and "We will detect this difference" then aware of whether patients are getting the drug or a placebo. So, we w...

Is the correct answer subject to "ad hominem", as it attacks the source of argument?

Is answer D a sufficient rather than necessary assumption? As a strain of virus could be prevalent in year 1, and then in year 10, but at that time. high-risk individuals still need to receive a new vaccine for it.