My problem with answer D is that it appeals to the principle of maximizing the company's overall positions rather than the sales figure of the newest product. The stimulus is certainly ambiguous about what it means by "success" and it may be argued that a drug company manager would natural...

@justinjordantyler We are not required to falsify the argument in the statement by stating a causal relationship. That is, to falsify the statement T --> E requires demonstrating T -/-> E and not, as you say, "T --> ~E" (the two are not equivalent). Nor does answer E obviously de...