by ohthatpatrick Mon Feb 02, 2015 2:51 pm
Yeah, I think you're right. It mostly comes down to "prevailing".
We know that "some critics" (line 1) have a type of critique, and we know that Marcuse's writings are central to this type of critique.
The view of "some critics" is described and we are told how Marcuse's writings relate to that view.
But ... nothing's gonna give us "prevailing".
If you haven't already committed to training your eye to spot extreme language, make sure you do! It's my #1 friend when it comes to Reading Comp and to Inference / Necessary Assumption questions in LR.
The other way to potentially be less tempted by (D) is if you understood the entire passage as our author critiquing Marcusians.
Although the author starts the passage with "some critics", essentially the whole passage is about Marcuse's view. The "some critics" are simply people who agree with Marcuse. Our author is writing this passage in order to point out things she doesn't like about Marcusian theory.
So what would turn me off about (D) is that it sounds kinda like the 1st paragraph summed up several different views and then told us where Marcuse fits into that landscape.
But my pre-phrase for this question was, "P1 and P2 just tell us about Marcuse's view. P3 and P4 give us the author's objections/qualms to Marcuse's view."
=== other answers ===
(A) tempting ... the author IS summarizing Marcusian theory in P1. There is some discussion of political/economic things, but they seem to be from the point of view of Marcusian theory, not explaining the origin story of Marcusian theory. Keep it, but with a big ol' "meh" squiggle next to it.
(B) "false needs" is too narrow. I want this to mention Marcuse. The function of the 1st paragraph is to say, "This essay is about Marcusian critiques!" Plus, P1 doesn't outline several mechanisms by which false needs originate. Eliminate.
(C) I can stop reading at "evaluate". I know that the author didn't drop her opinion until P3.
(D) "prevailing" is too strong.
(E) This looks good too. How is different from (A)?
Which is more important to P1:
"describing Marcusian views"
or
"summarizing political/economic context"
Okay, (E) it is.